Warnick v. Childers
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
MOREMEN, Judge.
By this action the appellants have contested the will of William Warnick on the grounds that he was unduly influenced in its execution and lacked mental capacity to make it. At the trial the court refused to submit to the jury the undue influence issue. The jury found the will to be valid.
The will under attack was executed by decedent on September 29, 1952, some three months before his death, and when he was about 75 years of age. The will is in simple form and contains the customary clauses relating to debts and funeral expenses. The bulk of the estate was given to a niece,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Prichard v. KitchenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
- Kentucky Trust Co. v. GoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- McKinney v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
- Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Hines v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bye v. MattinglyKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
- Ward v. NortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
- See v. SeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956
- Kathryn Towery v. Craig T. McCormick in His Capacity as of the Estate of James T.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
- Self v. SchoolingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971