Legal Opinion

Brittania Sportswear v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 11, 1983No. Consolidated Court No. 81-1-00109, etcPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Watson, Judge:

This action places in issue the classification of imported merchandise consisting of several styles of jeans, which *213have a single fabric loop on their sides at the hip. The jeans were classified under items 380.00 1 (men’s) or 382.00 2 (women’s), Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), as modified by T.D. 68-9, as men’s or women’s wearing apparel, ornamented, of cotton.

Plaintiff claims that the loops do not render the articles “ornamented” within the meaning of the TSUS and that the articles should therefore be classified as men’s or women’s wearing apparel, not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Baylis Brothers, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. Endicott Johnson Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
  3. Ferriswheel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API