Cruzan v. Minneapolis Public School System
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. A teacher brought this case against the school district because she believes that she has been discriminated against on the basis of her religion and gender. The teacher could not show that she had been the victim of discrimination. Therefore, based on the review of the file, record, and proceedings herein, the court grants defendant’s motion.
BACKGROUND
Debra Davis began working for the Minneapolis School District (“school district”) in approximately 1969 as David Nielsen. In February or…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Valerie Harlston v. McDonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cruzan v. Special School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Carla Cruzan v. Special School Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002