Legal Opinion
Lake v. Esposito
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 24, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00601Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JAMES LAKE, Case No. 3:21-cv-601-SI Plaintiff and Counterclaim- OPINION AND ORDER Defendant, v. JAMES ESPOSITO; LAWRENCE LONERGAN, ESQ.; KEVIN MCDOWELL; VALAIS VENTURES, LLC; INSUPPLY LABS, LLC; SANILUX BRANDS; JOHN DOES 1-6; and XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-6, Defendants and Counterclaim- Plaintiffs. James Lake, pro se. Jason E. Hirshon and Seth R. Tangman, SLINDE NELSON, 425 NW Tenth Avenue, Suite 200, Portland, OR 97209. Of Attorneys for Defendants. Michael H. Simon, District Judge. Plaintiff James Lake, proceeding pro se, filed this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.