Legal Opinion
Grunseich v. Barnhart
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 8, 2006No. CV 03-6120 RCPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)
On May 9, 2006, plaintiff Aimee Gruns-eich filed a motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), with a supporting memorandum of points and authorities and the supporting declaration of her counsel, Young Cho, with exhibits. On May 25, 2006, defendant filed her response to plaintiffs motion. Plaintiff did not file a reply. This motion is decided in Chambers without oral argument, pursuant to Local Rule 7-15.
DISCUSSION
“[Section] 406(b) [of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Dale Wells, William Hlywa v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appeal of John S. HoggCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- George R. WEAKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Hearn v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Rodriquez v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Garcia v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Ellick v. BarnhartDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Carrillo v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
- Chavez v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- Guinn v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.