Legal Opinion

Hamila v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1993No. 65324PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Vera Hamila appeals from the order of the trial court which awarded summary judgment to defendant city of Cleveland in her negligence action. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.

I

On December 17,1991, plaintiff filed this action against defendant alleging that while crossing Euclid Avenue, she slipped and fell on a metal plate in the crosswalk and suffered personal injuries. Plaintiff then asserted two claims for relief: (1) that the city was negligent in its design and placement of the crosswalk; and (2) that the metal plate constituted a nuisance, pursuant to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Ruwe v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. City of Cleveland v. AmatoOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Hickman v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Power v. BolesOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API