Legal Opinion

Ansley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 18, 2013No. A13A1078; A13A1079; A13A1303PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boggs, Judge.

Randy Ansley, Brian Lamar Johnson, and Quincy Hannah were tried together and convicted of armed robbery. Their amended motions for new trial were denied, and they appeal, asserting various enumerations of error. Finding no error, we affirm.

All three appellants contend the trial court erred in denying their motions to suppress documentary and testimonial evidence.

When reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, we apply the “any evidence” standard, which means that we sustain all of the trial court’s findings of fact that are supported by any evidence. We construe…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  5. Teal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Silvey v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  2. Mobley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. Crankshaw v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  4. State v. LEDBETTER (And Vice Versa)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2024
  5. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API