Legal Opinion

Lancaster Electric Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Platt Iron Works Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 8, 1909No. 33PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court ofcthe United States for the Eastern District Of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

BRADFORD, District Judge.

The Platt Iron Works Company, the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, brought an action of assumpsit in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against the Lancaster Electric Eight, Heat and Power Company, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, and recovered judgment against the defendant for $6,541.68 damages, beside costs. For the reversal of this judgment this writ of error is prosecuted. It appears from the evidence and is not disputed that the plaintiff in 1907 was a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gunderson v. BreyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
  2. Murray Co. v. Citizens' Oil MillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API