Van Ameringen-Haebler, Inc. v. Helvering
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The Commissioner asks that the case be remanded to the Tax Court in order that it may be reconsidered in the light of the § 501(a) of the Revenue Act of 1942, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, which amended § 14(a) (2) and § 26(c) of the Revenue Act of 1936, and added subdivisions (f) and (g) to § 26 of that Act; § 501 (b) of the Act of 1942 having made these changes retroactive. Since the whole case was tried upon the assumption that the taxpayer’s liability depended upon the law as-it stood before 1942, it is obviously appropriate, if not necessary, that it should! be heard anew. Indeed, it might…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Helvering v. Northwest Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Helvering v. Magnus Beck Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commissioner v. Oswego Falls Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Railway Express Agency v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Railway Express Agency v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948