Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Oswego Falls Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 29, 1943No. 273PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The Commissioner contends that the taxpayer, without violation of the mortgage indenture, could have paid dividends in its unsecured notes (or other unsecured obligations) maturing more than “a year after their date.” There may perhaps be some doubt whether such obligations, if maturing before the mortgage bonds, would have violated the provisions of the indenture; but that is a question we need not consider. For, if dividends had been paid in unsecured obligations maturing after July 1, 1941, when the mortgage bonds were payable, those unsecured obligations would not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Helvering v. Northwest Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. Helvering v. Ohio Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Beck's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Slaymaker Lock Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  2. Bane v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  3. Bates Valve Bag Corp. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. Sumter Farm & Stock Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  5. Rahr Malting Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API