Legal Opinion
Davis v. Hemming
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 30, 1925PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The judgment entered in this action was appealed from by three of the defendants, the Arms Company and Otto L. and Frederick O. Hemming. We will consider first the appeal by the Arms Company. This appeal has two objects. It appeals from any judgment rendered against the Arms Company for the amount of the Davis claim, and from the provisions of the judgment entered in its behalf upon its cross-complaint. Was judgment properly rendered, on the facts found, against it, among other defendants, for the amount of the plaintiff’s claim?
The finding discloses that in May, 1919, the Arms Company…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Fogg v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Samuel Stores, Inc. v. AbramsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Crandall v. LincolnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
- Catlin v. Eagle Bank of New-HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1826
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. William M. Davis, Ashland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Norwalk Door Closer Co. v. Eagle Lock & Screw Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Bassett v. City Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- World Broadcasting System, Inc. v. BassTexas Supreme Court · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.