Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Juan Navarro, Andres Mugercia and Guillermo Perdomo

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 14, 1984No. 83-1602, 83-1639 and 83-1640Published

1DissentCudahy, Circuit Judge

Under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 96 S.Ct. 2392, 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976), the defendants were entitled to have the district court examine the INS file of the key government witness because there was a substantial basis for claiming that it might contain material information.

My disagreement with the majority concerns the threshold the defendants must cross before they are entitled to have the court review the information they seek. The majority rejects the Brady claim because the defendants have not yet shown that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Goldberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Phillip Onori and Theodore BukkyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Robert E. Deutsch and Alan BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API