Legal Opinion
Abel v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided March 15, 2017No. Appellate Case No. 2015-000602; Opinion No. 5474PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOCKEMY, C.J.:
In this appeal from the Administrative Law Court (ALC), Dan and Mary Abel (the Abels) argue the ALC erred in refusing to enforce a previous consent order requiring that wetlands on neighboring property be maintained. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
In 2000, Pawleys Island Baptist Church (the Church) filed an application for a coastal zone consistency certification to permit it to fill in wetlands during the construction of a new *437sanctuary. The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) issued the certification. The Abels, along with David Mims, challenged…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- C.A.N. Enterprises, Inc. v. South Carolina Health & Human Services Finance CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- Ecclesiastes Production Ministries v. Outparcel Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Ellis v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Pee Dee Stores, Inc. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Mishoe v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DD Dannar, LLC v. SC LAUNCH!, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020
- Richard J. Hook v. SCDHECCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023