Whaley v. State
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
This appeal presents issues of immunity and negligence. Reinstating a suit dismissed on summary judgment, we recognize a professional duty owed by a spe cialized provider of day care for developmentally disabled children in the use of a controversial technique called “facilitated communication” (FC). Because avoiding the infliction of emotional suffering is within the scope of the duty, the claim may proceed to trial though it asserts no actual or threatened physical harm. Liability may not be sought, however, for damages arising from an immunized report of child abuse.
FACTS
The appellant, and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
- Hunsley v. GiardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Shannon and Danny NELSON, Individually, and on Behalf of E.N. F/K/A E.N., a Minor, Appellees, v. Lynn M. LINDAMAN, Lynn M. Lindaman, M.D., P.L.C. D/B/A Lindaman Orthopaedic, and Mercy Medical Center—Des Moines, AppellantsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Snyder v. Medical Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Janaszak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Miles v. Child Protective Services DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.