Legal Opinion

Harbor Oil Transport Co. v. Plattsburgh Socony

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 5, 1945No. 36PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

This litigation concerns a collision in the Kill Van Kull at night between the tanker “Plattsburgh Socony” owned by the appellant, and the tanker “New England”, owned by the appellee. Cross libels in rem by the respective vessel owners were consolidated for trial, which resulted in interlocutory decrees holding both vessels at fault and awarding half damages to each libellant. The owner of the Plattsburgh Socony has appealed, contending that the collision was shown to have resulted solely from the faults of the New England.

The vessels collided at a point found by the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. The Victory & the PlymothianSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Lehigh Valley R. v. McAllister Lighterage Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. SKIBS A/S SILJESTAD v. S/S Mathew LuckenbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  2. Rice v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. The SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. Red Star Towing & Transportation Co. v. Tug CatherineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. Red Star Towing & Transportation Co. v. The HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API