Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Carter

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 29, 2003No. 2384PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLANDER, Judge.

This case is rooted in a contractual dispute between Damon A. Carter, appellee and cross-appellant, and his automobile insurer, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (“State Farm”), appellant and cross-appellee. Although State Farm insured Carter’s motor vehicle for theft, it refused to pay Carter’s claim of loss arising from the alleged theft of his *402automobile, because it considered the claim bogus. That decision prompted Carter to file suit against State Farm for breach of contract. A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County found in favor of Carter, awarding him damages…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Caldor, Inc. v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Selected Risks Insurance v. DeanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  5. Eisenhower v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. EplingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Cure v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Wilson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Roanoke County Circuit Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API