Selected Risks Insurance v. Dean
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtCompton, J.
In Virginia, the settled rule is that “a judgment of conviction or acquittal in a criminal prosecution does not establish in a subsequent civil action the truth of the facts on which it was rendered” and “such judgment of conviction or acquittal is not admissible in evidence” in the civil case. Smith v. New Dixie Lines, 201 Va. 466, 472, 111 S.E.2d 434, 438 (1959) (citations omitted). “The reason for the rule is that the parties in a criminal proceeding are not the same as those in a civil proceeding and there is a consequent lack of mutuality.” Id. In this dispute about insurance coverage,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Haring v. ProsiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bates v. DeversSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
- Eagle, Star & British Dominions Insurance v. HellerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Banovitch v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Bailey Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Edwards v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- Weinberger v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Lowery v. StovallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Cecil B. Jacobson, Jr. Reproductive Genetics Center, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Pulliam v. Coastal Emergency Services of Richmond, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1999
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.