Legal Opinion
Strauss v. Waseca Village Bowl
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 17, 1985No. C9-85-694PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
This appeal is from the trial court’s denial of a motion for a Schwartz hearing or in the alternative for a new trial. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Marion Strauss was injured when she slipped and fell in respondent’s bowling alley. After a two-day trial, the jury returned its special verdict finding that respondent’s negligence did not cause Strauss’s injuries, but apportioned 25% of fault to respondent. The relevant verdict questions and answers are:
1. Was the Defendant negligent in the operation of the bowling alley on December 29, 1979, at or immediately prior to this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Reese v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Peterson v. HauleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Juvland v. MattsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Nebben v. KosmalskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- District of Columbia v. TulinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Dubbe v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Potter v. American Bean & Grain Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Veit & Co., Inc. v. LOWRY HILL CONST. CO.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987