Legal Opinion

Rakestraw v. Town of Knightdale

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 2008No. COA07-866PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYSON, Judge.

Rita Rakestraw, et al., (“plaintiffs”) appeal from order entered by the superior court granting the Town of Knightdale’s (“the Town”) motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

I. Background

On 30 August 2006, plaintiffs filed a complaint and sought a declaratory judgment that an ordinance adopted by the Knightdale Town Council (“the Council”) was void and of no effect. The challenged ordinance and amendment rezoned an approximately 56.8 acre tract of land to a “highway commercial conditional district.” Prior to the adoption of the ordinance, the northern portion of the property was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heaton v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Wilkins v. SafranCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Sellers v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Sofran Corp. v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Williams v. Town of SpencerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Good Neighbors Or. Hill Protecting Prop. Rights v. Cnty. of RockinghamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. Walton N.C., LLC v. City of ConcordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. Irwin v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Rakestraw v. TOWN OF KNIGHTDALESupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Town of Pinebluff v. MartsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API