Sellers v. City of Asheville
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
A city has power to zone only as delegated to it by enabling statutes, and “a zoning ordinance or an amendment thereto which is not adopted in accordance with the enabling statutes is invalid and ineffective.” Heaton v. City of Charlotte, 277 N.C. 506, 513, 178 S.E. 2d 352, 356 (1971); accord, Keiger v. Board of Adjustment, 281 N.C. 715, 190 S.E. 2d 175 (1972). We agree with the trial court’s ruling that defendant City in this case failed to comply with applicable enabling statutes insofar as it attempted to extend its zoning ordinance to property outside of its corporate…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Heaton v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Keiger v. Winston-Salem Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carter v. Stanly CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Rakestraw v. Town of KnightdaleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Potter v. City of HamletCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Town of Lake Waccamaw v. SavageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Brown v. County of Charleston/Charleston County CouncilCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.