Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Funds Contained in Account Nos. 600-306211-006, 600-306211-011 & 600-306211-014 located at the Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 6, 1996No. 2234, Docket 96-6125PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSÉ A CABRANES, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal from a judgment for the appellees entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Denis R. Hurley, Judge), we are asked to decide whether 28 U.S.C. § 1355(b) (“section 1355(b)”), an amendment to the jurisdictional provisions of a civil forfeiture statute providing federal courts with jurisdiction over res located overseas, can be applied to an action begun before the effective date of the amendment. In addition, we consider whether so applying the amendment would present a likelihood of violating the Ex Post Facto…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  5. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Gary Laguerre v. Janet Reno, Jose, Martin Avelar-Cruz v. Janet RenoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Louis S. Caiola v. Citibank, N.A., New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. State Ex Rel. Olivieri v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  4. Doe v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  5. Doe v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API