Legal Opinion
In interest of D.M.J.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 21, 1984No. 13400PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAUS, Judge.
The trial court terminated appellant-mother’s parental rights in respect to her illegitimate sons, D.M.J. and T.H.L. The reputed father of D.M.J. denied paternity. Nonetheless, he consented to the termination of his parental rights. The reputed father of T.H.L. was deceased. The appellant-mother presents two points of alleged error.
Her first point is that the petition sought termination upon the basis of § 211.447.2(2)(i)b, RSMo Supp.1984, (unrec-tified conditions) and the court impermissi-bly terminated her rights upon a finding under § 211.447.2(2)(b) (neglect). Due process…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Interest of WFJMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Zemcuznikov v. FordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Dunn v. DunnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Interest of M.R.H. v. McElrothMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Juvenile Officer for the 11th Judicial Circuit v. C.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Division of Family Services v. V.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Juvenile Officer v. D.R.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- In the Interest of LGSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- In the Interest of P.A.W. v. A.M.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- J.O. v. Taney County Juvenile OfficeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.