Legal Opinion

In the Interest of P.A.W. v. A.M.W.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1986No. 50066PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, Judge.

The mother, A.M.W., appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating her parental rights to P.A.W., her four-year old son.1 The juvenile court assumed jurisdiction under section 211.031 RSMo 1978, and entered the termination order pursuant to section 211.447.2(2)(e) RSMo 1978.

On appeal, the mother argues that the juvenile court erred in: (1) basing its decision to terminate her parental rights on a statutory provision that was not in effect when the termination petition was filed; (2) overruling the mother’s motion to dismiss the termination petition for failure to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In the Interest of D.G.N. v. S.M.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. In Interest of WFJMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Pike v. PikeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. Walker v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Juvenile Office of Cape Girardeau County v. M.E.J.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Juvenile Officer v. D.R.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Phillips v. Hoke Construction, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Callahan v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Rickard v. RickardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Missouri Department of Mental Health v. Juvenile OfficerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API