Legal Opinion

H. G. Hill Co. v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1937No. 8 Div. 776PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The. case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts.

The error assigned by appellant is that “the lower court erred in rendering judgment for the plaintiff.”

The cross-assignments of error by appelle'e are that “the trial court erred in rendering judgment for the appellee for less sum than that claimed in the amended complaint,” and “in not including in the judgment awarded appellee against appellant the sum of $100.00 claimed * * * as attorneys’ fees.”

The trial was had on amended count 2, and defendant pleaded in short by consent the general issue, with the usual leave to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Vinyard v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Crowson v. CodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Louisville N. R. Co. v. CoursonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Cobbs v. NorvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Giddens v. BollingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frahn v. Greyling Realization CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Fife v. Pioneer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. AAA Equipment & Rental, Inc. v. BaileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Suggs v. Alabama Power CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. Hurst v. DavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API