Legal Opinion

David Bishop v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 29, 2020No. 0:19-cv-00420Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA DAVID BISHOP, Case No. 19-CV-420 (NEB/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT ST. JUDE MEDICAL S.C., INC., Defendant. David Bishop, in his Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 79 (“TAC”)), names St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. (“SC”) as the sole defendant in this case. The TAC alleges violations of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 12900, et seq. (“FEHA”) and common law wrongful termination in violation of public policy. SC moves to dismiss the claims asserted against it in the TAC…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Samvel Topchian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  3. KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. ASupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Bjc Health System v. Columbia Casualty Company, Atg Assurance Company Limited v. Columbia Casualty Company, Doing Business as Cna HealthproCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API