Legal Opinion

In re Syracuse, Binghamton & New York Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 1928PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

It is provided in chapter 470 of the Laws of 1926, known as the General District Law, in brief that public districts may be created for the purpose of carrying on one or more public functions intended to benefit generally the inhabitants or the property of such district. In August, 1927, the town board of Fenton, Broome county, upon petition undertook to organize a water district with certain specified boundaries. A portion of the right of way of a railroad owned by the Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad Company and leased by the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company was…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. DecaturSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Chicago and North Western Railway CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People Ex Rel. D., L. W.R.R. Co. v. WildyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Wabash Ry. Co. v. City of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  4. Board of Education v. Village of AlexanderNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  5. In re the Assessment of Water Tax in Water District Number Three of the Town of NiskayunaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API