Legal Opinion

Hall v. Lampert

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 24, 2004No. 01-07-1233-M; A118503PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Petitioner was indicted in 1997 on nine charges of sexual offenses committed against his daughter and granddaughter. After his conviction on all charges, he sought post-conviction relief, claiming that his counsel was constitutionally inadequate for failing to move to dismiss four of the charges on grounds that they were barred by a six-year statute of limitations, pursuant to ORS 131.125(2). In particular, petitioner asserted that statements made to police in 1987 constituted a report of the four offenses of rape and sodomy involving his daughter, thus requiring those charges to be brought…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Lichau v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Haynes v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. HutchisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SaulsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Moser v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. ElademCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. State v. McCroreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API