Unwired Planet, LLC v. Apple Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER
VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge
I. Introduction
Unwired Planet has sued Apple for patent infringement. Unwiréd asserts claims from four different patents: U.S. Patent No. 6,317,831 ('831 patent), U.S. Patent No. 6,532,446 ('446 patent), U.S. Patent No. 6,646,260 ('260 patent), and U.S. Patent No. 6,321,092 ('092 patent). The parties have cross-moved for summary judgment on various issues.
Apple’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement is granted with respect to the '831 patent, the '446 patent, and the '260 patent. This means several of the parties’…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- R+L Carriers, Inc. v. DriverTech LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Unwired Planet, LLC v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015