Legal Opinion

M.H. v. Pelham Union Free School District

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 7, 2016No. 15 Civ. 00060 (RMB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION & ORDER

Hon. Richard M. Berman, United States District Judge.

I. Background

On January 6, 2015, M.H. and S.H. (“Parents”) individually and on behalf of their son, S.H. (“S.”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) commenced this action pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (the “IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., against the Pelham Union Free School District (“Defendant” or “Pelham”). Plaintiffs appeal from adverse administrative decisions of the New York State Education Department Impartial Hearing Officer (“IHO”) and State Review Officer .(“SRO”). They request that the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. M.H. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. T.M. ex rel. A.M. v. Cornwall Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  3. Lillbask ex rel. Mauclaire v. Connecticut Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. C.F. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  5. M.W. ex rel. S.W. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hill v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API