Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Conners
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 13, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNova, J.
Motion to dismiss the amended complaint herein as to both the first and second causes of action on the ground that on the face thereof it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The defendant Conners Marine Co., Inc., by the other defendant, Arthur Conners, president of the defendant Conners Marine Co., Inc., wrote a letter to the plaintiff United Marine Division, Local No. 333: “ Attention: Mr. William Y. Bradley, President and General Manager,” the other plaintiff in the action.
In the letter was the following: “ I am getting sick of this damn nonsensical business on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ostrowe v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Wells v. Belstrat Hotel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Stone v. Textile Examiners & Shrinkers Employers' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Rusciano & Son Corp. v. MihalyfiNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Finkle v. Westchester Newspapers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rickbeil v. Grafton Deaconess HospitalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Mims v. Metropolitan Life Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Pirre v. Printing Developments, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Lubliner v. ReinlibNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Walrus Manufacturing Co. v. Excel Metal Cabinet Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.