Legal Opinion

Sperle v. Weigel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1964No. 8140PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Judge.

The plaintiff, Kate Sperle, appeals from a judgment of the District Court of Bur-leigh County dismissing her complaint. She asks for a trial de novo.

In her complaint she sought either the rescission of a sale and the return of her purchase money or damages because of alleged fraudulent representations by the Weigels which induced her to buy a four-unit apartment building.

Miss Sperle, a spinster fifty-one years of age, had spent most of her life on a farm near Napoleon, North Dakota, caring for her brothers and sisters after the death of their mother. In recent years she had…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kester v. CrillyIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Brod v. BrodIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Schaff v. KennellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  4. McGlaughlin v. PickerelIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Waddell v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. West v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kary v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Barker v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Golden Eye Resources, LLC v. GanskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Omlid v. SweeneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API