Sperle v. Weigel
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Judge.
The plaintiff, Kate Sperle, appeals from a judgment of the District Court of Bur-leigh County dismissing her complaint. She asks for a trial de novo.
In her complaint she sought either the rescission of a sale and the return of her purchase money or damages because of alleged fraudulent representations by the Weigels which induced her to buy a four-unit apartment building.
Miss Sperle, a spinster fifty-one years of age, had spent most of her life on a farm near Napoleon, North Dakota, caring for her brothers and sisters after the death of their mother. In recent years she had…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kester v. CrillyIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
- Brod v. BrodIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Schaff v. KennellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- McGlaughlin v. PickerelIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
- Waddell v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- West v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Kary v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Barker v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Golden Eye Resources, LLC v. GanskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Omlid v. SweeneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.