Legal Opinion

State v. Frisby

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1916No. 2856PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Fourth. District; Eon. A. B. Morgan, Judge. George Frisby was convicted of larceny. He appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The defendant was convicted of the larceny of a heifer, which, under our statute, constitutes a felony.

1 One of the principal assignments of error is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.

One of the principal witnesses for the state was one Price, who at the time of the alleged larceny was in the employ of the defendant. Price testified to the killing of the animal by the defendant, who, he says, was assisted by the witness and defendant’s boy, a lad about 14 years of age, and, among other things, testified in detail to the killing of the animal. He described…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BaumUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. BowenUtah Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State v. ParkUtah Supreme Court · 1914
  4. State v. PowellUtah Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State v. GillumIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Gilroy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API