Legal Opinion

Conte v. Conte

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 30, 2001No. 01-98-00651-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUGGAN, Justice (Retired).

This is an appeal of two summary judgments, awarded in a declaratory judgment action. In the first summary judgment, the trial court ruled that an action by one co-trustee to remove another would not violate the “in terrorem” or “no contest” clause in the trust. In the second, the trial court ruled that the co-trustee who defended the action was not entitled to be reimbursed for his attorney’s fees from the trust. Appellant presents two issues, asserting the trial court erred in granting the summary judgments because (1) a suit to remove a co-trustee violates…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oake v. Collin CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. McLendon v. McLendon, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  3. Estate of Hodges, Matter Of, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986
  4. Gunter v. Pogue, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
  5. Myrick v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Marion v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  3. Di Portanova v. Monroe, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  4. Di Portanova v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  5. Preuss v. STOKES PREUSSSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API