Di Portanova v. Monroe
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHERRY RADACK, Chief Justice.
In this appeal, we consider whether a suit for non-dispositive administrative consolidation of several trusts, filed by guardians of a partially incapacitated person pursuant to Section 112.054 of the Texas Property Code, triggered an in terrorem1 clause in the wills creating the trusts, thus resulting in a forfeiture of the ward’s interest in the trusts. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The Parties
Ugo Di Portanova is the 74-year-old grandson of H.R. and Lillie Cullen. Ugo is partially incapacitated2 and has lived with Annunziata and Umberto LaMatta since 1974. In 1998,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lesikar v. Moon, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- McLendon v. McLendon, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Gunter v. Pogue, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
- Conte v. Conte, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cynthia Mynard v. Charles Ashley Degenhardt, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2023
- Elaine T. Marshall and E. Pierce Marshall Jr. v. Preston Marshall, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2021
- Elaine T. Marshall and E. Pierce Marshall Jr. v. Preston Marshall, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2021
- In the Estate of Frances Vogelsang Walzel v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2023
- In the Estate of William Reese Wynn, Sr. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.