Griffiths v. Wolfram
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of tbe district court for Blue Earth county, Waite, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
Defendants, as partners, were erecting a machine-shop on their own ground in Mankato. One Wysong, a bricklayer, was doing the brick-work for the engine-room, furnishing labor and materials at so much per thousand bricks, under a special contract with the defendants. Among other things, he was constructing in the cor*186ner of the engine-room a small apartment, seven or eight feet square, to be used as a place of deposit for shavings. This apartment was to be covered with a brick arch. A wooden frame-work, (or, as it is styled in the complaint, a centre-piece,) over which to build the arch, was by…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Osborne v. MorganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Robinette v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Rogers v. OvertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Brower v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Fell v. Rich Hill Coal Mining Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1886
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.