Legal Opinion

Griffiths v. Wolfram

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 29, 1875PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of tbe district court for Blue Earth county, Waite, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

Defendants, as partners, were erecting a machine-shop on their own ground in Mankato. One Wysong, a bricklayer, was doing the brick-work for the engine-room, furnishing labor and materials at so much per thousand bricks, under a special contract with the defendants. Among other things, he was constructing in the cor*186ner of the engine-room a small apartment, seven or eight feet square, to be used as a place of deposit for shavings. This apartment was to be covered with a brick arch. A wooden frame-work, (or, as it is styled in the complaint, a centre-piece,) over which to build the arch, was by…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Osborne v. MorganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Robinette v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Rogers v. OvertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Brower v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Fell v. Rich Hill Coal Mining Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1886

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API