Legal Opinion

In Re Cummings Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1959No. 43, Calendar No. 47,669PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

355 Mich. 210 (1959)

93 N.W.2d 881

In re CUMMINGS ESTATE.

CUMMINGS

v.

HARRIS.

Docket No. 43, Calendar No. 47,669.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided January 12, 1959.

Quinn & Bennett (John B. Bennett, of counsel), for proponent.

E.B. Reese, for contestant.

VOELKER, J.

This is an appeal growing out of a will contest. The facts necessary to our decision are undisputed. The proponent was a nephew of the testator and sole beneficiary under his will. The contestant filed certain objections, averring that he was a son of the testator. Proponent raised issue in probate court on contestant's relationship to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Domboorajian v. DomboorajianMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. In Re Cody's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. National Surety Co. v. Thayer's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Szarama v. Tylman's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. In Re Brown's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Kasuba EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Veterans Airport Service, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Izzo v. PurcellMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Department of Treasury v. RickleMichigan Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API