Nolin v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
STAKELY, Justice.
Petitioner insists that Wiley v. State, 16 Ala.App. 93, 75 So. 641, cited by the Court of Appeals in support of its position, is an authority dealing with § 362; Title 14, Code of 1940, and not § 363, Title 14, Code of 1940. However that may be, the authorities appear to hold that in order to make out a case under § 363, among other things, it is necessary to show that the indebtedness secured by the lien was unpaid. McWhorter v. State, 16 Ala.App. 168, 76 So. 325; Cox v. State, 25 Ala.App. 38, 140 So. 617.
Writ denied.
LAWSON, GOODWYN and ■ MERRILL, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cox v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
- Wiley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
- McWhorter v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farris v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Taylor v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965