Monarrez v. Utah Department of Transportation

1 47 I respectfully dissent. Given the circumstances of this case and the state of the law until today, I would accord today's ruling only prospective effect.

T48 Monarrez contends that, under the cireumstances of this case, we should apply our interpretation of the Limitations Provision prospectively only. He asserts that the statutory question we decide today has never before been addressed by our courts and that given case law interpreting equivalent provisions in the APA and GRAMA, the language of the GIAU was not sufficiently clear to inform him that a complaint filed within one year of…