United States v. Levy
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Defendant Raphael R. Levy (“Levy”) entered into a written plea agreement, in which he pled guilty to two offenses and the government agreed to recommend concurrent sentences. Although the government recommended concurrent sentences at the sentencing hearing, the district court sentenced Levy to consecutive sentences for the two offenses. Levy now appeals his sentences, arguing that the government breached the plea agreement and that the district court deprived him of due process. After review and oral argument, we affirm Levy’s sentences.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A. Offenses
On December 13, 2000, a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Barney Canada, A/K/A Byron Levon CanadaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Eddie Raymond RewisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Peter Anthony TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. David Carlson, United States of America v. Carina Leveriza, A/K/A Carina Franz, A/K/A Karen, United States of America v. Walter FranzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. MoncivaisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. HorsfallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.