Legal Opinion

Cumberland Mineral Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 16, 1975No. 114-73PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Ctjeiam : This case comes before the court on plaintiff’s exceptions to the recommended decision filed by Senior Trial Judge Mastín G. White on September 13, 1974, pursuant to Buie 134(h), having been submitted to the court on oral argument and the briefs of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, since the court agrees with the said recommended decision,* as hereinafter set forth, it hereby affirms and adopts the same as the basis for its judgment in this case. It is therefore concluded that plaintiff is not entitled to recover and the petition is dismissed.

OPINION OE TRIAL JUDGE

White,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Company v. SoderbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Rock House Fork Land Co. v. Raleigh Brick & Tile Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. McCombs v. StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Beury v. SheltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  5. Rudd v. HaydenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Foster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  2. Spurlock v. Santa Fe Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. Florman v. MEBCO Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
  4. National Food & Beverage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Western Nuclear, Inc. v. AndrusDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API