Rudd v. Hayden
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Stites
— Affirming.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Livingv ston circuit court sitting in equity. The appellant, Mrs. Pearl Rudd, is the owner of the surface rights in a tract of land containing 125 acres located on -the bank of the Cumberland river in Livingston county. She concedes that the appellees are the owners of mineral rights in this property, but insists that their rights do not include title to a limestone bluff from which stone has been quarried by the surface owners, or under the permission of the surface owners, for several years.
The property…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Hudson & Collins v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- McKinney's Heirs v. Cen. Ky. Nat. Gas. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Beury v. SheltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
- Brady v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Heinatz v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Buchanan v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
- Akers v. BaldwinKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
- Maynard v. McHenryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Board of County Com'rs of Roosevelt County v. GoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.