Legal Opinion

Applewhite v. Bivens

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 9, 2010No. Civil Action 09-0766 (RMU)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying Without Prejudice the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss as Moot

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. The pro se plaintiff, an incarcerated inmate, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that prison officials ignored his warnings that another inmate had threatened to harm him. The defendants argue, inter alia, that they are entitled to summary judgment because the plaintiff…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API