Legal Opinion

Reedy v. Millizen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1895PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Moultrie county; the Hon. Edward P. Vail, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This is a bill to redeem from a sale and deed by a trustee, made April 29, 1878, under a trust deed executed by one Ira A. A. W. Camfield, dated March 1, 1875, and to set aside a subsequent conveyance by the purchaser at such sale to appellee Millizen. Appellants claim as heirs-at-law of Camfield, who is conceded to have been the owner of the land in controversy. The bill was filed less than three years after appellants attained their majority, so that the Statute of Limitations would not run against them unless it had commenced to run during the lifetime of said Camfield, under…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tisdale v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hancock v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Whiting v. NichollIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Eagle's CaseNew York Surrogate's Court · 1856

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Policemen's Benevolent Ass'n v. RyceIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Reedy v. CamfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Gantt v. American National InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Piersol v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  5. Beckwith v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API