Legal Opinion

State Bank of La Crosse v. Michel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for La Crosse-county: E. 0. Higbee, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

WiNslow, 0. J.

This is an action brought against tbe surety upon a promissory note of $2,500. Tbe defense was that tbe plaintiff bad in its bands collateral security turned-out by tbe principal to secure tbe payment of tbe note and applied said security to tbe payment of tbe principal’s debt to another bank, and that by this act tbe surety was wholly discharged under tbe provisions of tbe Negotiable Instrument Law (sub. 4a, sec. 1679 — 1, Stats.). Tbe trial court found that tbe plaintiff bank applied tbe sum of $1,331 of funds received by it from tbe sale of goods pledged to it by tbe…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Plankinton v. GormanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Lowe v. ReddanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Defiance Machine Works v. GillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Citizens Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Estate of Onstad v. OnstadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Utah State Nat. Bank v. LivingstonUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Elkhorn Production Credit Asso. v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API