Legal Opinion
Kaiser v. North
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1939No. Docket Nos. 14-17, Calendar Nos. 40,500-40,503PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
In these cases plaintiffs seek to recover damages alleged to have been sustained in consequence of the negligent manner in which an automobile belonging to tbe defendant, William J. North, Sr., was driven by his son, the defendant William J. North, Jr. The litigants reside in Detroit, Michigan; but the accident happened in the province of Ontario, Canada. In each of these cases the declaration, as amended, contains two counts. In the first count only ordinary negligence is alleged, but in the second count defendants are charged with gross negligence and wilful and wanton misconduct. And…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Olmstead v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Sutherland v. Kennington Truck Service, LtdMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Abendschein v. FarrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Sexton v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- In re Air Crash Disaster Near Chicago, Illinois on May 25, 1979Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.