Legal Opinion

Hartzell v. State Board of Examiners in Psychology

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 14, 1980No. 21196PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

Appellant Arthur W. Hartzell’s application for licensure as a psychologist was rejected by respondent The State Board of Examiners in Psychology. This action was commenced by appellant’s petition to the Court of Common Pleas alleging, inter alia, that the Board’s ground for his rejection is invalid and therefore he must be licensed; and the statutory method by which members are appointed to respondent Board violates Article III, Section 1 of the South Carolina Constitution. The court below dismissed the petition. We affirm.

Appellant was notified by respondent Board that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashmore v. Greater Greenville Sewer Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  2. Gold v. South Carolina Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Spearman v. F. S. Royster Guano Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  4. Floyd v. Thornton, SEC. of StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  5. Gould v. BartonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garris v. Governing Board of the South Carolina Reinsurance FacilitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Toussaint v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Garris v. GOV. BD. OF SC REINSURANCESupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Marchetti v. Alabama Board of Examiners in PsychologyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  5. Toussaint v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API