Legal Opinion
Floyd v. Thornton, SEC. of State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 3, 1951No. 16567PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Henderson, Acting Associate Justice.
The petitioners, now the appellants, desired to organize a bank, to be known as the Bank of Manning. Their application to the Secretary of State for a charter was refused, for the reason that the Board of Bank Control had not given its unconditional approval. In this action the petitioners prayed that the Court order the Secretary of State to issue the charter. They also asked that section 7829-2 of the Code of 1942 be declared unconstitutional and void, and that the acts of the Board of Bank Control, on petitioners’ application for a charter, be declared…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Feldman v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Hutchison v. York CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Wallace v. Sumter CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
3Cited by15 opinions
- Erickson v. Jones Street Publishers, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- First State Savings & Loan v. PhelpsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Group Health Ins. of NJ v. HowellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Wall v. FennerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.