Uniflow Mfg. Co. v. Superflow Mfg. Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
This is a patent and copyright infringement action.
Plaintiff has dismissed the copyright infringement action. Section 116, 17 U.S.C.A. provides that in such actions the prevailing party shall be awarded its full costs and the court may award reasonable attorneys’ fees as part of such costs. A voluntary dismissal by plaintiff after the defendant has taken depositions and filed a motion for more definite statement makes the defendant the prevailing party. Corcoran v. Columbia Broadcasting System, 9 Cir., 121 F.2d 575. However, from the exhibits on file in this action it…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Corcoran v. Columbia BroadcastIng System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Advertisers Exchange, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Aldrich v. Remington Rand, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1942
- Krafft v. CohenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. London Music, U.K.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2004
- Lum v. Mercedes Benz, USA, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
- Farrar v. FarrarDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1952
- United States v. Marion L. Kincaid TrustDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Ottman v. GatesFranklin County Municipal Court · 1987