Legal Opinion
Farrar v. Farrar
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided July 16, 1952No. Civ. No. 994PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.
Judgment upon stipulation of the parties was entered on May 3, 1952, for the plaintiff. Following the provisions of the judgment and under Rule 54(d), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., the Clerk taxed costs in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $318.35. Within the time permitted by the rule the defendants filed a motion to retax the costs and for a review by the court of the Clerk’s action.
The defendants attack an item of $277.35 allowed by the Clerk as “costs incident to taking of depositions.” Comprising this item is the sum of $105 costs paid…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Harris v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Collins v. WaylandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. OBEARNESTER GLASS CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- W. F. & John Barnes Co. v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Popeil Brothers, Inc. v. Schick Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Banks v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1950
- Bowman v. West Disinfecting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Cox v. MadduxDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1968
- International Woodworkers of America, Afl-Cio and Its Local No. 5-376 v. Champion International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.