Legal Opinion

Baker v. ANTWERPEN MOTORCARS LTD.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 23, 2011No. Civil WDQ-10-2342PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge.

Charlene Baker 1 and William and Leslie Flanigan (the “plaintiffs”) sued Antwerpen Motorcars Ltd. and related entities (the “Antwerpen Automotive Group”) 2 for various state and federal claims based on the failure to disclose that cars sold to them had been used as short-term rentals. For the following reasons, the Antwerpen Automotive Group’s motion to compel arbitration will be denied.

I. Background

On February 3, 2007, Doris Baker (“Doris”) bought a used 2005 Ford Focus from Antwerpen Nissan, a Maryland dealership. Compl. ¶¶ 13, 20.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Adkins v. Labor Ready, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  3. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. MeadeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. In Re Merritt Dredging Company, Inc., Debtor. Compliance Marine, Inc. v. Kevin Campbell, Trustee--AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  5. Kramer v. Bally's Park Place, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Kantsevoy v. Lumenr LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  2. Ademiluyi v. Pennymac Mortgage Investment Trust Holdings I, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  3. Roach v. Navient Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  4. Balt. Scrap Corp. v. Exec. Risk Specialty Ins. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  5. Ford v. Antwerpen Motorcars Ltd.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API